[ Return to Home Page ]

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Me(ga)lomania

As regular readers are aware, the Glass Man has gotten big into the New Knicks this season.

Awoken from their lost decade by the play of Amar'e Stoudemire, Raymond Felton, Danilo Gallinari, and the rest of the gang, the Knicks were, by and large, young, cheap, and likeable.

Sure, they weren't title contenders, but Rome wasn't built in a day and after all those years of awful play and despicable management, even a sixth seed with an enjoyable team was cause celebre at the Garden.

I'll be the first to admit that I don't know enough about basketball to say anything definitive about the deal that blew up the Knicks and remade them in the image of the Heat (minus a third superstar). And I'm sure I'll find plenty to like about Carmelo Anthony once he starts chipping in 25 a night alongside Stoudemire.

But this deal just feels wrong to me, and cheap. It feels like they sold the farm to get a guy they probably could have had three months from now at no cost beyond his salary (which they're giving him anyway). I know, I know. The new CBA; they had to get him while they could.

It just reminds me of so many misbegotten moves the Mets have made over the years when they "had" to make a big splash to appease the fan base, or "had" to give up a few solid prospects to get the guy who was supposed to push them over the edge but had no honest chance of doing so.

You know what people don't talk about enough when it comes to New York sports fans? How they've all got REALLY short memories. For all the disgust and bad will generated by the past decade of Knicks basketball, people love this team again, two games over .500 and all.

Now they get 'Melo and they're supposed to be title contenders but, clearly, they're not. They're in "win now" mode; the Cinderella story thing they kind of had going in the first half of the season is gone, swept out the door along with guys like Gallo (first round pick the Knicks plucked out of obscurity), Felton (career year, great pick and roll combo with Amar'e), and Wilson Chandler (a latter day Allan Houston, in his way).

It would be like the Mets trading Ike Davis, Jon  Niese, Mike Pelfrey, and Bobby Parnell for Albert Pujols, or really someone a cut or two below that. You'd have your superstar, but you'd lose all of the excitement of hoping and wishing and playing the "what if" game about how those young players might develop someday.

They say one in the bag is worth two in the bush, and sure enough it is. There are plenty of Knicks fans out there who are thrilled to have 'Melo joining Amar'e. I'm not one of them. To me it just feels like another New York sports team trying to make headlines. Hopefully I'm wrong.

- A.F.O.M.G.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Basketball is not baseball.

In basketball, you win by putting the best talent possible on the court. Look at every championship team ever -- there's not one team there that didn't have at least two Top 25 guys playing on their roster. Kobe, Gasol. KG, Pierce, Allen. Duncan, GinĂ³bili, Parker. Kobe, Shaq. Etc, etc, etc.

Plucky rookies and homegrown talent can win you a season in baseball. That recipe gets you a first-round loss in the playoffs in the NBA. Two completely different sports, two completely different ways to win.

And don't get me wrong, I've thoroughly enjoyed watching the young talent blossom for the Knicks this year. But they were two games over .500 for a reason. If you've really enjoyed your viewing experience thus far -- stick around, it's about to get a whole lot better.

1:46 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Mets Extra is an independent sports website that is not affiliated with any other news outlet. Mets Extra (including its predecessor, Yankees 2000: Promote the Curse) is not affiliated in any way with the New York Mets, the New York Yankees, WFAN Sports Radio 66 ("The FAN"), Major League Baseball, the National League, the American League, or any other professional sports franchise or entity.