Fixing Citi Field: 5 Action Items
Here at Y2K we're all about a bias to action. We see problems and we want to be part of the solutions.
That's why, when Jeff Wilpon asked, I could hardly refuse offering my top five actionable suggestions for enhancing Citi Field.
Let me be clear: I think Citi Field has a lot going for it. As a physical structure, as something you behold from the parking lot or the 7 train or the vantage point of a Goodyear blimp, it's a beautiful presence.
What needs fixing is what's under the hood. It all comes back to the same complaint that's been registered since the day Citi Field opened for business: to look at it you'd never know the Mets played there.
As an organization, the Mets seem to be sensitive to this charge; at the All Star Break the team mounted its championship banners on the wall in left center field, a welcome change.
What I'd like to do here is make suggestions for 5 other "welcome changes" that the Mets could implement. Some of these suggestions are novel, others you've heard before elsewhere; either way, I've then ranked each of them on a 1-10 scale of feasibility -- 1 being extremely difficult to implement, 10 being extremely easy to implement.
So without further ado and in no particular order:
1. Murals, placards, neon lights... Do something with the stairwells.
Exiting and entering the stadium or just walking between levels it never going to be anyone's highlight of going out to a ballgame. But as it is, the stairwells between levels are about the most depressing places at Citi Field.
They don't have to be. Rather than seeing Fuhrer-bunker gray all around you, why not do something with the vast swaths of empty wall?
Remember those massive placard photographs they had hanging around Shea Stadium, the ones with pictures of Casey or Piazza or the '86 Mets celebrating? Those pictures meant something to the fans; we'll never have the history of the Yankees, but those pictures told you you were part of something, something that had its own charm and mystique.
Not feeling the pictures? Why not use the neon light player cutouts that used to be on Shea's exterior? Or why not let school children come in and paint murals of happy children at the ballpark (like we had in the stairwell at my school growing up)?
The possibilities are limitless, and it might be the easiest possible upgrade out there. But please, ANYTHING would be better than what we have now.
Feasibility rating: 9.
2. Give the Security guards and field attendants blue, orange, white, or black parkas... anything but Phillie maroon.
This one is so obvious it hurts. When I ask who in the Mets organization is ensuring quality control, ask who the person is that signs off on all the key decisions, these are the things I'm wondering about.
Who in their right mind would have authorized the field attendents at the Mets' ballpark to wear the color of their biggest rival? It boggles the mind.
But put that aside. This is an easy fix. The Mets have not one, not two, not three, but four (!!) uniform colors to choose from. Personally my vote would be for blue-based parkas, but blue, orange, black (it's slimming!) or white, the only way they can go wrong on this one is if they keep it the way it is.
Feasibility rating: 10.
3. Make "Shea Club" boxes.
The Mets have 38 seating categories, including the Big Apple Reserved, Empire Party Suites, Caesars Club, Metropolitan Box Gold, and, of course, Ebbets Club.
The fact that there is no Shea Club is inexplicable. The Mets called Shea Stadium home for 44 years, what other criteria exists for getting a suite named in your honor?
More than semantics, it would tell the fans that you respect the place of Bill Shea and Shea Stadium in the team's history. Indeed, Bill Shea is the sine qua non of the entire organization -- he deserves that respect.
Particularly in light of the Ebbets Club (note, there is no Polo Grounds Club), the lack of a club in Bill Shea's honor is kind of disgraceful.
Feasibility rating: 10.
4. Establish a museum on the history of National League baseball in New York.
In a sense, this would be the ideal way to enter the ballpark. The Jackie Robinson Rotunda, while beautiful, doesn't feel entirely right today, and will feel even more bizarre years from now as more and more people with a memory of the Brooklyn Dodgers pass.
If you could have a do-over, a rotunda commemorating the history of National League baseball in New York would be, to my mind, a really powerful way to enter the stadium.
But what's done is done. I still think an installation on the history of NL ball in New York would be a really cool addition to Citi Field.
For one thing, it would give the New York Giants their due. No matter what the Wilpons might want to believe, the heritage of the team contains the Giants as well as the Dodgers, and as a fan of the Mets, I'm intereted in that history, too.
But more importantly it would create a living, breathing space to commemorate the history of the Mets. Again, there's a really compelling story there, one that Mets fans want to know about.
Is it possible? Good question. I wonder if some of the office space in right center field could be converted into this museum. If there's a way to do it the Mets should look into it.
Feasibility rating: 4 (?).
5. Please, paints the seats blue and orange and the outfield walls blue.
In my role as a blogger I often have to look for pictures of Mets players. What strikes me as I look through the options presented on Google images is there's a major difference between pictures of the Mets at Shea and pictures of them at Citi Field.
When you look at a picture of a Met at Shea (one of him swinging the bat or high fiving another player), you can tell he's at the Mets' home park. There's blue on the walls all around him, and the seats you can see through the fans are orange. You know immediately. It's home.
With none of those flourishes, Citi Field does not immediately situate you in the home of the Mets. Really, it could be any team's ballpark, the Mets just happen to play there.
Come to think of it, that's the source of this entire exercise to begin with.
Feasibility: 10.
* * * * *
So there you have it, my top 5 ways to enhance Citi Field. Are you picking up what I'm putting down? Did I leave any great ideas off the list? Curious as always for your thoughts.
- A.F.O.M.G.
That's why, when Jeff Wilpon asked, I could hardly refuse offering my top five actionable suggestions for enhancing Citi Field.
Let me be clear: I think Citi Field has a lot going for it. As a physical structure, as something you behold from the parking lot or the 7 train or the vantage point of a Goodyear blimp, it's a beautiful presence.What needs fixing is what's under the hood. It all comes back to the same complaint that's been registered since the day Citi Field opened for business: to look at it you'd never know the Mets played there.
As an organization, the Mets seem to be sensitive to this charge; at the All Star Break the team mounted its championship banners on the wall in left center field, a welcome change.
What I'd like to do here is make suggestions for 5 other "welcome changes" that the Mets could implement. Some of these suggestions are novel, others you've heard before elsewhere; either way, I've then ranked each of them on a 1-10 scale of feasibility -- 1 being extremely difficult to implement, 10 being extremely easy to implement.
So without further ado and in no particular order:
1. Murals, placards, neon lights... Do something with the stairwells.
Exiting and entering the stadium or just walking between levels it never going to be anyone's highlight of going out to a ballgame. But as it is, the stairwells between levels are about the most depressing places at Citi Field.
They don't have to be. Rather than seeing Fuhrer-bunker gray all around you, why not do something with the vast swaths of empty wall?
Remember those massive placard photographs they had hanging around Shea Stadium, the ones with pictures of Casey or Piazza or the '86 Mets celebrating? Those pictures meant something to the fans; we'll never have the history of the Yankees, but those pictures told you you were part of something, something that had its own charm and mystique.
Not feeling the pictures? Why not use the neon light player cutouts that used to be on Shea's exterior? Or why not let school children come in and paint murals of happy children at the ballpark (like we had in the stairwell at my school growing up)?
The possibilities are limitless, and it might be the easiest possible upgrade out there. But please, ANYTHING would be better than what we have now.
Feasibility rating: 9.
2. Give the Security guards and field attendants blue, orange, white, or black parkas... anything but Phillie maroon.
This one is so obvious it hurts. When I ask who in the Mets organization is ensuring quality control, ask who the person is that signs off on all the key decisions, these are the things I'm wondering about.
Who in their right mind would have authorized the field attendents at the Mets' ballpark to wear the color of their biggest rival? It boggles the mind.But put that aside. This is an easy fix. The Mets have not one, not two, not three, but four (!!) uniform colors to choose from. Personally my vote would be for blue-based parkas, but blue, orange, black (it's slimming!) or white, the only way they can go wrong on this one is if they keep it the way it is.
Feasibility rating: 10.
3. Make "Shea Club" boxes.
The Mets have 38 seating categories, including the Big Apple Reserved, Empire Party Suites, Caesars Club, Metropolitan Box Gold, and, of course, Ebbets Club.
The fact that there is no Shea Club is inexplicable. The Mets called Shea Stadium home for 44 years, what other criteria exists for getting a suite named in your honor?
More than semantics, it would tell the fans that you respect the place of Bill Shea and Shea Stadium in the team's history. Indeed, Bill Shea is the sine qua non of the entire organization -- he deserves that respect.
Particularly in light of the Ebbets Club (note, there is no Polo Grounds Club), the lack of a club in Bill Shea's honor is kind of disgraceful.
Feasibility rating: 10.
4. Establish a museum on the history of National League baseball in New York.
In a sense, this would be the ideal way to enter the ballpark. The Jackie Robinson Rotunda, while beautiful, doesn't feel entirely right today, and will feel even more bizarre years from now as more and more people with a memory of the Brooklyn Dodgers pass.
If you could have a do-over, a rotunda commemorating the history of National League baseball in New York would be, to my mind, a really powerful way to enter the stadium.
But what's done is done. I still think an installation on the history of NL ball in New York would be a really cool addition to Citi Field.
For one thing, it would give the New York Giants their due. No matter what the Wilpons might want to believe, the heritage of the team contains the Giants as well as the Dodgers, and as a fan of the Mets, I'm intereted in that history, too.
But more importantly it would create a living, breathing space to commemorate the history of the Mets. Again, there's a really compelling story there, one that Mets fans want to know about.
Is it possible? Good question. I wonder if some of the office space in right center field could be converted into this museum. If there's a way to do it the Mets should look into it.
Feasibility rating: 4 (?).
5. Please, paints the seats blue and orange and the outfield walls blue.
In my role as a blogger I often have to look for pictures of Mets players. What strikes me as I look through the options presented on Google images is there's a major difference between pictures of the Mets at Shea and pictures of them at Citi Field.
When you look at a picture of a Met at Shea (one of him swinging the bat or high fiving another player), you can tell he's at the Mets' home park. There's blue on the walls all around him, and the seats you can see through the fans are orange. You know immediately. It's home.
With none of those flourishes, Citi Field does not immediately situate you in the home of the Mets. Really, it could be any team's ballpark, the Mets just happen to play there.
Come to think of it, that's the source of this entire exercise to begin with.
Feasibility: 10.
* * * * *
So there you have it, my top 5 ways to enhance Citi Field. Are you picking up what I'm putting down? Did I leave any great ideas off the list? Curious as always for your thoughts.
- A.F.O.M.G.


10 Comments:
Great post.
I love your take on the walls & seats.
The coats for the Security...could very easily be blue.
Can't comment on too much else because I have not been to citi field yet. Many reasons...many excuses. I need to get it done
No need to change the seat colors. They looked terrible at Shea. The Green seats look classy. I am fine with changing the wall. i personally don't mind it, but if it will shut people up just do it.
I agree with you other suggestions, although, I don't think people need to really care what the security guards are wearing.
If the Mets are winning, there will be lots of partying in those stairwells, just like the ramps at Shea
very good well written article. i also feel that citifield is lacking a mets personality.
1- agree with the stairwells. he unpainted concrete makes it look unfinished. liven it up with some pictures
2- dressing staff in blue/orange makes them blend in with fans, when they should be standing out
3- not having any recognition of shea stadium or te polo grounds, makes the ebbets field/dodger stadium presence stand out more.
4- agree on the rotunda. too much dodger history
5- why the walls aren't blue like in the old stadium is beyond eme. the black is too dark and boring and lame
I wonder what the take on Citi Field would have been if the Mets had played great in 2009 and made the playoffs. The ballpark is not the problem, the team is. It's as simple as that. The only suggestion I really agree with is a Shea club. That would be a good touch.
i like your ideas. i'd like to submit a few others from my blog.
RememberingShea - Re-Built This Citi
Yes, yes, yes on #4.
You see, that's exactly what I expected when coming into the JR Rotunda. I was sorely disappointed. I really like the tribute to Jackie but we need a tieback to National League baseball and the Mets.
The big #42 has to go. I'm sorry but's that just a "Hitchhiker's Guide" punchline. If you want a tribute to the man, put a statue there.
Maybe there's room in the Rotunda for statues or plaques for the retired numbers or HOFamers who played for the Mets.
I mirror whay "Anonymous" said about the jakcets on security. I was tole they used the colors they did so they could be easily identified. If they were wearing black, blue and orange like everyone else in the building, they would blend in too much.
And supposedly the black walls with the Orange Home Run line is their (weak) tribute to the NY Giants. SO you can't take that away, and then complain that there's no mention of the Giants at Citi Field.
You do realize they can just remove padding for another color and not have to paint it.
The seats would need the painting since replacing them would cost money.
I agree about the rotunda and museum. Just put a museum of baseball in New York from its very early Highlanders/Gothams beginnings, the Giants, Dodgers, and the Negro Leagues. It is an incredibly half-assed attempt to honor Jackie Robinson and to say Wilpon had no ulterior motives for such things would be short-sighted. He is selling Dodgers merchandise in the stadium, none of which sells, I hope.
Ebbets Club is also a legacy of Wilpon's childhood fixation on a team that nobody gave a damn about until they moved and has nowhere near the rich history in New York save the 1950s than the Mets. I agree name it Shea Club.
Somebody suggested to put life into the walls by doing what St. Louis, Atlanta, and the White Sox has done with iconography of their honored people. He said call the LF area Kiner's Korner (maybe call that the foul pole too along with the RF pole Payson Pole, you know before those Phillies fans get away from calling it Utley-Ville). I really like that idea better than the blue. Look at the original designs, it just looks terrible, especially when the new shade of Mets blue looks more Kansas City Royals than what the original Mets blue shade was.
Here's three simple suggestions for the rotunda that won't offend ownership's delicate sensibilities:
1) No pictures of Robinson in a Dodgers home uniform. "Brooklyn" across the chest is fine, "Dodgers" is not.
2) Replace the one (I think there's only one) offending image (per suggestion 1), with this one:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.achievement.org/achievers/may0/large/may0-049.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/photocredit/achievers/may0-049&usg=__1ywSrzymsmep5Jb411wRYSIyvy8=&h=396&w=385&sz=123&hl=en&start=2&um=1&tbnid=7StL7YoE9izb7M:&tbnh=124&tbnw=121&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%2522Jackie%2BRobinson,%2522%2BAND%2B%2522WIllie%2BMays%2522%26ndsp%3D18%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox%26rlz%3D1I7GGLG_en%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1
It features Jackie and--gasp--a member of a pennant-winning Met team in one Willie Mays. Also and again, we're not seeing refernce to the Giants or the Dodgers in the picture, save for Mays's hat... which we all know is offensive to ownership, but hopefully they can live with it.
3) Add another picture actually relevant to both Jackie and the Mets, not to mention a significant day in baseball history featuring the Mets: 4/15/97, the day Jackie's number was retired throughout baseball. A nice image of then-president Clinton, Selig, and Rachel Robinson, at crazy blue-walled Shea Stadium, might work.
As a bonus, as opposed to the suggestions of some for a NY-NL baseball exhibit of sorts... why not throw some love to the forgotten fourth team relevant to the creation of our Mets: The AA's Metropolitan Baseball Club (1880-1887), sometimes referred to as the NY Metropolitans, AKA, the NY Mets. No one else will claim them anyway (also, like our Mets), and they even come equipped with the 1884 AA pennant, nevermind a history that kicks off 23 years before the Orioles left Boston for New York and became the Yankees.
I don't have many problems with Citi. Most of what people say are just people being whiny. Anyway, as other's have mentioned, the guards where that color so they don't blend in. Fine.
The seat colors and walls are a tribute to the Mets first home, the Polo grounds. I'm fine with this. Many of the complaints heard are simply a difference of opinion. The Wilpon's is no less meaningful than ours, in fact, it's probably worth more. The same can be said of the decision to have the seats closer and restricted views than put them so far away we can't see anyway.
(Here's one of my little ideas for a change btw: http://www.ceetar.com/optimisticmetsfan/2009/05/22/new-citi-field-scoreboard-idea/)
No reason not to rename the Metropolitan Box or Baseline box for Polo Grounds and Shea. or something. LF Landing should go back to Koogan's (sp?) Landing, even if it is the worst seats in the place.
More Mets stuff all over (I haven't been recently to see the new additions, but there can never be enough)
Sure, Shea's walkways/ramps/staircases were barren too, but there is no reason they can't spray paint the round Mets ball logo onto each level of the staircase. Can even put the citi logo on the opposite side. i don't care.
Honor all NY baseball, from the Giants and Dodgers and Mets to the Negro League teams. (No Yankees, they have their own stadium and are from Baltimore anyway)
Rename parts of the park, the bridge, the Danny Meyer food court area, after Mets and Mets moments. (I heard a cool suggestion to name something the Piazza. I think that'd be perfect for the Plaza on the promenade behind home plate (you know, where a catcher would hang out..))
There is lots to be done, and I know they rushed to get the stadium important stuff done in time, the seats and the players and the field. With this off season, I expect to see a lot of new stuff added that represents the Mets, because it's already (because the Mets play there) the best stadium in the majors.
Post a Comment
<< Home